## 23 Jul Birch Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture

Download this post as PDF (will not include images and mathematical symbols).

This is a conjecture regarding the number of rational points in elliptic curves i.e. curves in two-dimensional plane with the equation y^{2} = x^{3} + a x + b for some whole numbers a,b. In the early 1960’s, the British mathematicians Brian Birch and Peter Swinnerton-Dyer started to use computers to gather data on rational solutions of such equations. The pattern they found led them to a bold conjecture in algebraic number theory which if solved will have major consequences in number theory.

It can be proved that the set of rational points E(Q) on an elliptic curve E forms a commutative group under a geometrically defined addition operation (not the usual coordinate-wise addition). It was also proved by Mordell that E(Q) is finitely generated i.e. there is a finite subset of E(Q) such that every point in E(Q) can be expressed as a sum of elements of this finite subset. By Group theory any finitely generated commutative group is isomorphic (carbon copy) to Z^{r} x G_{0}, where G_{0} is a finite group, Z is the group of integers and integer r ≥0 is called the rank (in this case the rank of the elliptic curve E). Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer carried out computations on a fast computer to guess a formula for r which gives an idea of how big E(Q) is. In particular they wanted to find whether there are infinite number of rational points on E which will be the case if r > 0. Conceptually they were therefore trying to count the rational points on E. But since this is an infinite set they used modular arithmetic to estimate how big the set really is. For any given prime p, let N_{p} be the number of pairs (x,y) of integers modulo p such that y^{2} = x^{3 } + a x + b (mod p).

They reasoned that if E(Q) is infinite then p<xNpp should approach infinity as x approaches infinity since N_{p} can be almost p^{2} for large number of primes p. Conversely they expected that if r = 0, the product remains bounded as x approaches infinity. Their expectations were confirmed when they found that the experimental data fitted the observation that p<xNpp behaves like (log x) ^{r}.

To get a conjecture for a formula for r they tried now to obtain an infinite product function L(E,s) which has at least formally a value given by the above product just as in the case of Euler’s product function as a definition of the zeta function. The correct infinite product function in this case was found to be the Hasse-Weil L-function given by

L(E,s) = all primes p(1-1+p- Npp-s + p1-2s)-1

At least formally now L(E,1) is all primes ppNp. However rigorously the infinite product converges only for Re(s) > 3/2. It was expected that L(E,s) has an analytic continuation to the whole complex plane. This was known as Hasse conjecture and is a consequence of another well-known conjecture : the Tanayama-Shimura conjecture. A special case of the last conjecture was proved by Wiles and Taylor on their way of proving Fermat’s Last Theorem. The Tanayama-Shimura conjecture was completely proved in 1999 which proved Hasse conjecture as well. This established that there is an analytic function L(E,s) defined on the whole complex plane which has the above product expansion for Re(s) > 3/2 . In terms of this function then Birch Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture could then be stated as ;

Birch Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture : For an elliptic curve E, the Taylor expansion of L(E,s) at s = 1 has the form L(E,s) = c (s – 1) ^{r} + higher order terms with c ≠ 0 and r = rank(E). In particular, E(Q) is infinite if and only if L(E,1) = 0.

In 2000, this was named as a millennium problem.

Some partial progress have been made by various individuals towards a solution of the problem. A special mention can be made of Professor Manjul Bhargava of Princeton University (see note at the end of this article) and Arul Shankar who contributed a paper to arxiv.org in 2010 reporting some results for the case of rank zero.

The previous three purely mathematical Millennium problems can at least be explained in a way such that a person with a good undergraduate or postgraduate education in Mathematics can understand what the problems are all about. But this is not true of the next problem viz. the Hodge conjecture. Indeed the official statement involves so many layers of abstraction that even very established mathematicians will have difficulty in understanding the technical details. Therefore we shall remain content by providing the official statement and rough explanations of a couple of technical terms.

**Note on Professor Manjul Bhargava : **Professor Manjul Bhargavais is a Canadian American mathematician of Indian origin. He received his Ph.D. working under Andrew Wiles and was hired as a tenured full Professor within only two years of his receiving his Ph.D. degree. He is also an accomplished tabla player learning under Gurus like Zakir Hussain.

**[This is an article in our series of articles on the Millennium Problems.]**

Managing Editor of the English Section, Gonit Sora and Research Fellow, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna.

## Iyengar ( Shyam )

Posted at 00:54h, 04 AugustDear Manjil,

It was a nice effort in putting something regarding the conjecture. But to add something specially on Manjul’s result, I can add the answer by Mathew Emerton . May be this is something useful.

Bhargava and Shankar have proved results about average 3-Selmer ranks of elliptic curves. (See the arxiv preprint) Their argument is via geometry of numbers (so to speak).

In fact, they are able to construct families such that exactly half of them have positive sign in their functional equation, and with average 3-Selmer rank bounded by 7/6. (This can be achieved by imposing appropriate conditions on the coefficients of the elliptic curve, and computing the root number as a product of local roots numbers.) Now work of the Dokchitser brothers on the parity conjecture implies that for elliptic curves with sign +1, the rank of the 3-Selmer group is even. When combined with the bound of 7/6, they deduce that the 3-Selmer groups of the curves with sign +1 that lie in their family must be trivial.

Now (under some additional assumptions about the 3-torsion, and some other technical assumptions, which they are able to impose on their family) by applying the results of Skinner and Urban on the Main Conjecture (which lets one pass from triviality of a Selmer group to non-vanishing of the L-function) they deduce that the curves in their family having sign +1 also have non-vanishing L-value at s=1.

Now a positive proportion of elliptic curves overall lie in their family, and so putting all this together, one finds that a positive proportion of elliptic curves have both 3-Selmer rank zero (and in particular, Mordell–Weil rankg zero) and also analytic rank zero. Thus, a positive proportion of elliptic curves satisfy (the rank part of) BSD.

From my brief reading of the paper, the work of Kolyvagin and Gross–Zagier is not actually used (at least explicitly); Wikipedia seems to be in error on this point.

## Gonit Sora

Posted at 16:47h, 05 AugustThanks a lot for the comment. I am sure the readers would be benefited.